Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.5 | |
| Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 38 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |