Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 11 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 21 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Despite the higher power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.3 | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 930 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 281 litres). In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 24 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 756 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`405 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |