Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs Peugeot 4007 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 199 NM | 232 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Peugeot 4007 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 23 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Due to the lower power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm longer than the Peugeot 4007, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 510 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1686 litres | |
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 69 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`410 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 6600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |