Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 38 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |