Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 11 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 59 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is larger. Citroen C-Crosser is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Citroen C-Crosser has 39 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |