Citroen C-Crosser 2011 vs BMW X3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 3 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 1 NM less than BMW X3. Despite less power, Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 67 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 8 cm longer than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1560 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 39 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
BMW X3 has
| |