Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Subaru Forester 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Citroen C-Crosser also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 170 HP | 147 - 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 198 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 6.5 - 12.4 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru Forester are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Citroen C-Crosser. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.4 | 6.3 - 10.5 | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Citroen C-Crosser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen C-Crosser is 9 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`344 kg | ~ 2`027 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`765 kg | ~ 1`503 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 579 kg | ~ 524 kg | |
| Citroen C-Crosser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Subaru Forester. Therefore, Citroen C-Crosser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |