Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Citroen C-Crosser also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 170 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.4 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Citroen C-Crosser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 13 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 115 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 731 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`344 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |