Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 170 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.4 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
On average, the Citroen C-Crosser petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan X-Trail. On average, Citroen C-Crosser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`344 kg | ~ 2`079 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`765 kg | ~ 1`553 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 579 kg | ~ 526 kg | |
| Citroen C-Crosser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Citroen C-Crosser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |