Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 170 HP | 147 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 199 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 9.7 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.4 | 5.8 - 10.4 | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Citroen C-Crosser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C-Crosser is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Citroen C-Crosser has 333 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`344 kg | ~ 2`216 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`765 kg | ~ 1`564 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 579 kg | ~ 652 kg | |
| Citroen C-Crosser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |