Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 170 HP | 117 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 380 NM | 154 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 10 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.4 | 5.7 - 8.1 | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Citroen C-Crosser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is larger. Citroen C-Crosser is 36 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser has more luggage capacity. Citroen C-Crosser has 22 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 467 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`344 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |