Citroen Berlingo 1999 vs Volvo V40 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo V40, but torque is 15 NM more than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.41 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 37 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 39 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |