Citroen Berlingo 1999 vs Seat Inca 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 20 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 26 HP more power than Seat Inca, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Seat Inca. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| 960 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Inca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 1436 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Inca has more luggage space. Citroen Berlingo has 812 litres less trunk space than the Seat Inca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Seat Inca has
| |