Citroen Berlingo 1998 vs Subaru Impreza 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen Berlingo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Impreza) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 142 HP less power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Subaru Impreza. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 13.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.40 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 24 cm shorter than the Subaru Impreza, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 40 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Impreza has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |