Citroen Berlingo 1997 vs Kia Carens 2000
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Carens is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 20 HP less power than Kia Carens, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Kia Carens. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Citroen Xantia | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Shuma, Kia Sephia, Kia Clarus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Carens might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Carens engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.60 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 33 cm shorter than the Kia Carens, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 605 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2800 litres | 1752 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Kia Carens may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1048 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Carens, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`780 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`170 kg | 1`264 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 486 kg | |
| Citroen Berlingo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Kia Carens. Therefore, Citroen Berlingo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Kia Carens has
| |