Citroen Berlingo 2000 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 108 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 13 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, but torque is 1 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen Berlingo 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Berlingo is 11 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | 2500 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Citroen Berlingo has 74 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |