Citroen Berlingo 1997 vs Volvo V40 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 34 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.41 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 37 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 39 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | 1421 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 153 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |