Citroen Berlingo 1997 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 21 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.46 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 27 cm shorter than the Suzuki Baleno, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 34 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 249 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Baleno. The Suzuki Baleno may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Suzuki Baleno has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Suzuki Baleno, so Suzuki Baleno quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |