Citroen Berlingo 2002 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.61 m | |
Citroen Berlingo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 20 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | 1780 litres | |
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 174 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The Skoda Roomster may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1020 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |