Citroen Berlingo 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | 18.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 7 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.45 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 36 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | 1225 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 198 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1575 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Berlingo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |