Citroen Berlingo 2005 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, but torque is 1 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Despite the higher power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 26 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Citroen Berlingo 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Citroen Berlingo is larger. Citroen Berlingo is 10 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 650 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | no data | |
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen Berlingo has 26 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Citroen Berlingo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`150 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Citroen Berlingo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Citroen Berlingo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |