Citroen Berlingo 2015 vs Dacia Dokker 2013
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo and Dacia Dokker have the same engine power, but Citroen Berlingo torque is 40 NM more than Dacia Dokker. Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Berlingo is 2 cm longer than the Dacia Dokker, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen Berlingo has 125 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. This could mean that the Citroen Berlingo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |