Citroen Berlingo 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Citroen Berlingo engine produces 7 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Despite the higher power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger. Citroen Berlingo is 13 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 17 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 30 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Citroen Berlingo has 195 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 1`694 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |