Citroen Berlingo 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Citroen Berlingo engine produces 2 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Despite the higher power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger. Citroen Berlingo is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 33 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Citroen Berlingo has 145 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 1`608 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |