Citroen Berlingo 2012 vs Hyundai i30 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 16 HP less power than Hyundai i30, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.47 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 34 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 1642 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 147 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The Hyundai i30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1358 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai i30 scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai i30 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |