Citroen Berlingo 2012 vs Fiat Doblo 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 25 HP more power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Fiat Doblo. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Stilo, Fiat Grande Punto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Berlingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Citroen Berlingo has 115 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Doblo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Fiat Doblo, so Fiat Doblo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |