Citroen Berlingo 2012 vs Dacia Logan 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 107 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 45 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 5.9 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.55 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 11 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 573 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 1518 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 102 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Logan. The Dacia Logan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1482 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |