Citroen Berlingo 2012 vs Fiat Doblo 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 3 HP more power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Fiat Doblo. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Stilo, Fiat Grande Punto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Doblo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Citroen Berlingo has 115 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Doblo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Fiat Doblo, so Fiat Doblo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |