Citroen Berlingo 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2010

 
Citroen Berlingo
2008 - 2012
Skoda Fabia
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP105 HP
Torque: 215 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.4 seconds11 seconds
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Berlingo engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.64.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km5.1 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1250 km on highway
980 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.25 m
Width: 1.81 m1.64 m
Height: 1.80 m1.50 m
Citroen Berlingo is larger.
Citroen Berlingo is 13 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 17 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 30 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 675 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
3000 litresno data
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity.
Citroen Berlingo has 195 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia.
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 1.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0401`694
Safety:
Quality:
low

average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 32003800
Pros and Cons: Citroen Berlingo has
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv