Citroen Berlingo 2008 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.46 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 34 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 258 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo V50 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Berlingo, so Volvo V50 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |