Citroen Berlingo 2015 vs Dacia Dokker 2013
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Dacia Dokker is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 5 HP less power than Dacia Dokker, but torque is 5 NM more than Dacia Dokker. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Berlingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Berlingo is 2 cm longer than the Dacia Dokker, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen Berlingo has 125 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. This could mean that the Citroen Berlingo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Dacia Dokker, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`823 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |