Citroen Berlingo 2015 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 34 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 17 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 2600 litres | |
| Citroen Berlingo has 15 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |