Citroen Berlingo 2015 vs Dacia Lodgy 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 30 HP more power than Dacia Lodgy, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Dacia Lodgy. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Lodgy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Lodgy might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 12 cm shorter than the Dacia Lodgy, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 100 litres | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 675 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
| In 7-seat version Dacia Lodgy has more luggage space (by 727 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Dacia Lodgy, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Lodgy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Dacia Lodgy has
| |