Citroen Berlingo 2015 vs Dacia Dokker 2013
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 30 HP more power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Dacia Dokker. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Berlingo is 2 cm longer than the Dacia Dokker, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen Berlingo has 125 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. This could mean that the Citroen Berlingo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Dacia Dokker, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |