Citroen Berlingo 2012 vs Fiat Doblo 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.6 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Doblo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 15 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Fiat Doblo. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Berlingo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Fiat Grande Punto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Doblo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Berlingo is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 675 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Citroen Berlingo has 115 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Doblo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Fiat Doblo, so Fiat Doblo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |