Citroen Berlingo 2009 vs Citroen Berlingo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Citroen Berlingo 2009 engine produces 10 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo 2002, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Citroen Berlingo 2002. Despite the higher power, Citroen Berlingo 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo 2009 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo 2002, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo 2009 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Berlingo 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen Berlingo 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo 2009 is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Berlingo 2009 is 24 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo 2002, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo 2009 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 642 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 2800 litres | |
| Citroen Berlingo 2009 has 18 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo 2002. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo 2009 (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo 2009 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Berlingo 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo 2009 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo 2002 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo 2009, so Citroen Berlingo 2009 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |