Citroen Berlingo 2018 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger. Citroen Berlingo is 31 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, 16 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 50 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 50 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2126 litres | 1238 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 888 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |