Citroen Berlingo 2018 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen Berlingo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Fabia) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 8 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger. Citroen Berlingo is 14 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 19 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 38 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 597 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 597 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2126 litres | 1395 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 731 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`482 kg | 1`110 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 768 kg | 530 kg | |
| Citroen Berlingo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Citroen Berlingo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |