Citroen Berlingo 2018 vs Volvo V60 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 88 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo XC60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.43 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 36 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 41 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 597 litres | 529 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 597 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 529 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2126 litres | 1364 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 762 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Citroen Berlingo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V60 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 24 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |