Citroen Berlingo 2018 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Citroen Berlingo engine produces 16 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Despite the higher power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger. Citroen Berlingo is 19 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 597 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 597 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2126 litres | 2600 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 474 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`954 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kangoo is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Kangoo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |