Citroen Berlingo 2018 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Citroen Berlingo engine produces 12 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Clio. Despite the higher power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Berlingo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is larger. Citroen Berlingo is 14 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 19 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 40 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 597 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 597 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2126 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 1`711 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |