Citroen Berlingo 2018 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Berlingo engine produces 8 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Berlingo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.47 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 18 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 13 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 38 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 597 litres | 602 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 597 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 602 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2126 litres | 1650 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 476 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`482 kg | 1`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 768 kg | 590 kg | |
| Citroen Berlingo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Hyundai i30. Therefore, Citroen Berlingo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |