Citroen Berlingo 1997 vs Fiat Doblo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 108 HP | 63 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 - 205 NM | 102 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 19.9 seconds | 12.4 - 20.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.9 | 5.5 - 8.6 | |
|
Citroen Berlingo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Doblo. On average, Citroen Berlingo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Berlingo is 5 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Doblo, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`825 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |