Citroen Berlingo 2002 vs Opel Combo 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 110 HP | 70 - 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 215 NM | 125 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 20.4 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 7.4 | 5.1 - 7.5 | |
|
Citroen Berlingo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Combo. On average, Citroen Berlingo equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Citroen Berlingo is 18 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 624 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2800 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 169 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`862 | ~ 1`858 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |