Citroen Berlingo 2018 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen Berlingo is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 131 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 300 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 16.5 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.6 | 8.2 - 14.0 | |
|
Citroen Berlingo petrol engines consumes on average 6.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Citroen Berlingo equipped with diesel engines consume 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is smaller, but higher. Citroen Berlingo is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 775 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2126 litres | 2404 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Berlingo has 245 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 278 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 1.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Citroen Berlingo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`109 | ~ 2`737 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Berlingo has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |