Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 60 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.3 | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Town & Country could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.96 m | |
| Chrysler Town & Country is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Town & Country is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 9 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 125 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 125 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |