Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Renault Grand Espace 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Grand Espace, but torque is 55 NM less than Renault Grand Espace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.6 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Town & Country could require 510 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Town & Country is larger. Chrysler Town & Country is 23 cm longer than the Renault Grand Espace, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 125 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 125 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | 3050 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Espace has more luggage space (by 331 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Town & Country (by 1704 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |