Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Kia Carnival 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 174 HP | 144 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
Chrysler Town & Country is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 30 HP more power than Kia Carnival, but torque is 32 NM less than Kia Carnival. Thanks to more power Chrysler Town & Country reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.8 | |
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Town & Country could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
Chrysler Town & Country is larger. Chrysler Town & Country is 17 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Town & Country is 2 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 302 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 575 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 302 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`665 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |