Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Mercedes Vito 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 65 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mercedes Vito. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Town & Country) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | no data | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | no data | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 153 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 153 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
| |