Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Renault Trafic 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 174 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 278 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 92 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 8.0 | |
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Town & Country could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
Chrysler Town & Country is larger, but lower. Chrysler Town & Country is 31 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Town & Country is 19 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 9 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 153 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 153 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`765 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |